本文为代写assignment案例的代写要求，学科Strategic Leadership and Management，代写时应注意格式为report，最下面是打分标准，代写时应严格按照最高标准写作。
Moodle submission
 
Using appropriate examples from the business environment, critically evaluate the relationship between Strategic Leadership and Human Resource Management covering learning outcomes 1-4
 
 
Learning Outcomes:
1.     Establish a critical knowledge and understanding of theories, concepts and models relating to leadership and management, strategic thinking and strategic leadership.
2.     Critically evaluate examples of effective and ineffective leadership.
3.     Define and critically consider the relationship between Human Resource Management and the development of strategic leadership, within organisations.
4.     To critically evaluate and discuss the role of human resources in the development of organisational strategy
 
 
 
In this report you must demonstrate:
 
Ø  Critical knowledge and understanding of theories, concepts and models relating to strategy and leadership
 
Ø  The ability to relate and define relationships between strategy and leadership
 
Ø  The use of appropriate organisational examples to evidence your discussion
 
Marking Grid
 
Students Number
 
 

	A+     80-90 Excellent	A      70-79 Very good	B     60-69 Good	C   50-59 Satisfactory	F-Narrow Fail  40-49	F (20-39)
Knowledge and understanding	Command of the topic, creativity, perception and insight, all suggesting that work should be published in an academic forum	Demonstrates command of the topic by showing unusual creativity, perception and insight – a serious contribution to the academic debate	Outstanding selection that makes a substantial contribution to the academic debate	Understanding of contemporary academic debate, with some creative input	Descriptive while demonstrating reasonable understanding	Limited/poor understanding demonstrated Any creative input is somewhat off the point
Content/ Exploration of theories/ideas	Outstanding selection that makes a substantial contribution to academic debate	Outstanding selection from a wide relevant and innovative range of perspectives and sources	Selection from a wide and relevant range of perspectives and sources that draws upon contemporary academic debate	Relevant selection from a good and relevant range of perspectives and sources Sources mostly well-integrated into the overall argument	Relevant but not wide selection from a reasonable range of sources	Some/minimal relevant sources and limited topic coverage
Analysis/ Synthesis	Outstanding use of source material Excellent argument that is of the highest academic quality	Sources very well integrated into the overall argument Clear , well structured argument that is well crafted and cogent	Sources well-integrated into the overall argument Clear, cogent and well-structured argument	Mostly clear, cogent and well-structured argument	Sources sometimes properly integrated into the argument Some tendencies towards a clear and cogent argument	Sources only occasionally/not at all integrated into the argument Some/minimal structure and agrument present
Critical engagement and analysis	Critical distance and outstanding analysis of the question, to a high degree of excellence	Critical distance and outstanding analysis of the question	Critical distance and sound analysis of the question	Demonstrates criticality and generally good analysis	Some successful analysis with a tendency to accept the source material at face value	Limited/poor analysis and criticality with reliance on limited sources
Technical skills /referencing	Referencing impeccable using appropriate conventions Virtually no errors in grammar/spelling/syntax	Referencing clear and accurate using appropriate conventions Virtually no errors in grammar/spelling/syntax	Referencing clear and accurate using appropriate conventions Near perfect grammar/spelling/syntax, with only a few errors	Referencing clear and mostly accurate using appropriate conventions Good grammar/spelling/syntax with some errors	References adequate but clearer and/or more references needed. Reasonable grammar/spelling/syntax but with several errors	References limited/inappropriate Many errors in grammar/spelling/syntax making it difficult or impossible to read