Criteria

Effect  (strong/

moderate/ weak)

Reader’s Feedback

Assertion: transparency, importance

Moderate

Advantage: transparency in assertions and appropriate importance allocated to each assertion.

Disadvantage: assertions were not firm enough and were in need of words to highlight.

There was appropriate statement for each of the section, which achieved the equality of importance allocation.

Evidence: connection, citation, credibility

Strong

The assertions of the definition and evaluation of self-efficacy is adequate with supportive citations from relative studies. The citations were abstracted from reliable studies and were close to the assertions.

Organization: basic section,

Logic,

structure

Strong

The analysis the interview based on Kolb’s reflective cycle was stated in a narrative way and that’s quite clear. Each part was adequately stated in a logical way using the sub-headings.

Mechanics: spelling,

Grammar

Strong

Few spelling and grammatical mistakes are spotted.

Overall effectiveness

Strong

The author had mastered the key learning points of the given topic and has a good command of writing, which can be told from the convincing analysis, appropriate citations, and the well organized structure.

Criteria

Effect  (strong/

moderate/ weak)

Reader’s Feedback

Assertion: transparency, importance

Strong

Well-illustrated and adequately addressed assertions following the author’s reasoning step by step

Evidence: connection, citation, credibility

Moderate

Relative literature reviews was cited to help illustrate the author’s assertions, and was developed to the author’s own points of view with further cultivating. Anyway, there were not specific examples like the organizational cultures of specific countries or companies in the reasoning, which degraded the persuasion of this section.

Organization: basic section,

Logic,

structure

Moderate

A large page of reasoning and theory stating made reader’s eyes tired. The reasoning was not well-organized enough. It would be better if there was sub-headings at each step of the developing of reasoning

Mechanics: spelling,

Grammar

Strong

The author’s good sentence structure and correct spelling and grammar give readers a smooth reading experience

Overall effectiveness

Moderate

There were defects in the parts of evidence and organization, which made the reasoning not that convincing, thus more efforts to support your assertions are encouraged.

Criteria

Effect  (strong/

moderate/ weak)

Reader’s Feedback

Assertion: transparency, importance

Strong

Assertions on reflection of the two parties on the reduction measures are firm and neat. And appropriate amount of emphasis were laid on each section

Evidence: connection, citation, credibility

Moderate

Literature reviews: not sufficiently adequate, especially in the sections of reflection of the two parties on the reduction measures;

Anyway they are close connected to the topic

Organization: basic section,

Logic,

structure

Strong

Clear by sub-headings;

Section: simple in terms of structure, but makes the reasoning clear and neat.

Logic: quite smooth.

Mechanics: spelling,

Grammar

Strong

not perfectly beautiful;

few mistakes in the spelling and grammar

Overall effectiveness

strong

Main issue of the course were analyzed;

the problems were well figured out